Calculator · Free
HVAC Sizing Calculator
Estimate the heating and cooling capacity a home needs before you get equipment quotes.
Estimated cooling capacity
3.5tons
- Nearest nominal AC sizeEquipment is built in these steps only
- 3.5 ton
- Heating loadOutput the furnace or heat pump must deliver
- 54,000 BTU/h
- Furnace input at 80% AFUENominal 70k input model
- 67,500 BTU/h
- Furnace input at 95% AFUENominal 60k input model
- 56,842 BTU/h
- Cooling load densityRule-of-thumb range is 400–700 sq ft per ton
- 540 sq ft/ton
Get a Manual J before you buy equipment
Oversizing makes cooling worse, not safer
| Adjustment | Effect | Cooling BTU/h | Heating BTU/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline, climate zone 4 | 22 / 30 BTU per sq ft | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Ceiling height 8.0 ft | ×1.00 cool, ×1.00 heat | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Insulation — average | ×1.00 cool, ×1.00 heat | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Window area — average | ×1.00 cool, ×1.00 heat | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Sun exposure — average | ×1.00 cool, ×1.00 heat | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Air tightness — average | ×1.00 cool, ×1.00 heat | 39,600 | 54,000 |
| Occupants — 3 in the house | +600 BTU/h cooling, no heating credit | 40,200 | 54,000 |
| Design load | 3.5 tons cooling | 40,000 | 54,000 |
| Scenario | Cooling | Heating |
|---|---|---|
| As entered | 3.5 tons | 54,000 BTU/h |
| Tight and well insulated instead | 2.5 tons | 32,500 BTU/h |
| Leaky and poorly insulated instead | 4.5 tons | 84,500 BTU/h |
| Spread between those two | 2.0 tons | 160% |
What this assumes
- This is a load approximation, not an ACCA Manual J calculation.
- Climate zone factors follow the IECC climate zone map.
- Assumes an average building with no unusual solar gain, air leakage or zoning requirements.
Important
A proper equipment selection requires an ACCA Manual J load calculation, Manual S equipment selection and Manual D duct design. Use this to sanity-check a quote, not to order equipment. If a contractor sizes a system by square footage alone, that is a warning sign.
Understanding the result
Oversized equipment performs worse
An oversized air conditioner cools the air to setpoint before it has run long enough to remove humidity, then shuts off. The result is a house that is cold and clammy, with short cycling that wears the compressor and raises the bill. Bigger is actively worse in cooling.
The rule of thumb and why it fails
The old rule — roughly 500 to 600 square feet per ton — ignores insulation, window area and orientation, air leakage, ceiling height and climate. A well-sealed new house and a 1950s house of identical size can differ by more than a full ton.
What Manual J adds
A Manual J calculation measures your actual building: wall and attic R-values, window U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient by orientation, infiltration, duct location and internal gains. Reputable contractors run one before quoting a replacement, and many jurisdictions require it with the permit.
Climate zone shifts the number significantly
The same 2,000 square foot house needs 2.5 tons of cooling in Seattle and 4 tons in Phoenix. Heating load in Minneapolis is 2 to 3 times the heating load in Atlanta for the same house. Climate zone is the single largest variable in any load estimate.
Common questions
How many tons of AC do I need for 2,000 square feet?
Should I replace my system with the same size?
What size AC do I need for 1500 square feet?
How many BTU per square foot for heating?
What size furnace for 2000 sq ft house?
Is a 3 ton AC too big for my house?
What is a ton of AC in BTU?
How do I know if my AC is oversized?
What SEER rating should I look for?
How many square feet per ton of AC?
What size heat pump do I need?
You may also need
The next decision usually follows directly from this one.
- CalculatorDuct Size CalculatorSize round and rectangular duct from airflow and friction rate, with velocity checks.
- DiagnosticSuperheat & Subcooling CalculatorConvert pressure and temperature readings into superheat and subcooling to diagnose charge.
- ComparisonRepair or Replace CalculatorCompare the economics of repairing a failing system against replacing it outright.